An Acceptable Abnormality?

Freud and the Riddle of Fetishism

Ednei Soares (Author),

Series: Figures of the Unconscious

Category: Gender Studies, Psychoanalysis

Language: English

DOI: 10.11116/9789461667946

ISBN: 9789462705357

Publication date: August 17, 2026

€36.00 (including 6% VAT)

Buy Now

Number of pages: 173

Size: 234 x 156 x mm

Guaranteed Peer Reviewed Content

Funded by: Path to Open

Stock item: 173488

Standard delivery time for print books:

For Belgium: 5 to 8 working days

For EU: 2 to 3 weeks

For other countries: 4 to 5 weeks

Series: Figures of the Unconscious

Category: Gender Studies, Psychoanalysis

Language: English

DOI: 10.11116/9789461667946

ISBN: 9789461667946

Publication date: August 17, 2026

€31.00 (including 6% VAT)

Buy Now

Easy access with the Glassboxx app

Number of pages: 173

Guaranteed Peer Reviewed Content

Funded by: Path to Open

Series: Figures of the Unconscious

Category: Gender Studies, Psychoanalysis

Language: English

DOI: 10.11116/9789461667946

ISBN: 9789461667939

Publication date: August 17, 2026

€31.00 (including 6% VAT)

Buy Now

Easy access with the Glassboxx app

Number of pages: 173

Guaranteed Peer Reviewed Content

Funded by: Path to Open

SHARE

Unravelling the Fetish: Freud and the Riddles of Desire.

Long regarded as a marginal phenomenon, fetishism reshaped the foundations of psychoanalysis. By tracing the evolution of Freud’s thinking on fetishism — from his early pathologisation to his later understanding of it as a source of sexual and psychic meaning — this book reveals how his attention to fetishism compelled him to rethink desire, object‑choice, and the roots of inner conflict. In this book, Ednei Soares, drawing on the influence of Alfred Binet, early neuropathology, and later debates in Lacanian theory, as well as feminist, queer, and trans theory, explains why fetishism became central to discussions that shape gender studies today and contemporary reflections on identity.

An Acceptable Abnormality? invites readers to view fetishism not as a curious anomaly but as a powerful lens through which we can understand how desire takes form. This compelling book opens new ways of thinking about human sexuality, making it essential reading for specialists while remaining accessible to a broad audience.

This book will be made open access within three years of publication thanks to Path to Open, a program developed in partnership between JSTOR, the American Council of Learned Societies (ACLS), University of Michigan Press, and The University of North Carolina Press to bring about equitable access and impact for the entire scholarly community, including authors, researchers, libraries, and university presses around the world. Learn more at https://about.jstor.org/path-to-open/

Acknowledgements

Chapter 1 Introduction

Chapter 2 Freud and His Forebears: Binet and Krafft-Ebing
1. The Riddle of Fetishism
2. Alfred Binet and the Riddle of Fetishism
Binet and Doubling
Binet’s Conceptualization of Fetishism: The Birth of a Riddle
3. Freud, Krafft-Ebing, and the Problem of Perversions
Krafft-Ebing’s Classification of Perversions
Fetishism, Masochism, and Shared Aetiology
4. Freud’s Clinical Framework: The Neurosis–Perversion Opposition

Chapter 3 The Neurotic “Negative”: Freud’s Early Perversion Theory
1. Freud’s Early Aetiology of Neurosis and Perversion
2. Inherited Concepts: Trauma, Splitting, and Defence in Freud’s 1890s Work
3. The Nascent “Riddle”: Fetishism’s Challenge to Freud’s Early Framework

Chapter 4 The Initial Confrontation: Fetishism in Freud’s Three Essays and Early Revisions (1905–8)
1. Fetishism and the Breakdown of Freud’s 1905 Framework
2. Childhood Impressions and the Turn to Fantasy
3. Infantile Theories, Castration Anxiety, and the Object

Chapter 5 Deepening the Riddle: Fetishism, Trauma, and the Oedipus Complex (1909–20)
1. On the Genesis of Fetishism (1909)
2. The Role of the Fetish in Totem and Taboo
3. Freud’s Development of Binet’s Theory of Childhood Trauma
4. The Oedipus Complex and the Aetiology of Perversions
5. Fetishism and the Riddle

Chapter 6 Freud’s Late Works on Fetishism
1. Freud on Fetishism: Early and Late
2. Fetishism (1927) and Other Works
3. Freud on Disavowal, Scotomization, and Splitting in Fetishism
4. Freud on Binet on Double-Sided Fetishes
5. Fetishism in Freud’s Works in the Late 1930s
6. Freud, Fetishism, and the Brain
7. Freud’s Psychoanalytic Theory and Fetishism

Chapter 7 “Fetishism” and Freud’s Riddle in Jacques Lacan’s Work
1. Doubling, Personality, and Perversity in Lacan’s Theorization of Fetishism
Binet’s Ideas on Paranoia as Doubling of Personality in Lacan’s Explorations
Lacan’s Initial Approach to Fetishism
Lacan’s Psychoanalytic Model of Doubling
2. Lacan’s Debate on Fetishism with Object-Relation Theory
Fetishism as an Object-Relation Phenomenon
Fetishism as a Paradigm of Perversion in Lacan’s Theory
3. The Fetish as a Model of the Object of Human Desire in Lacan’s Thinking

Conclusion
References

Ednei SoaresORCID icon

Ednei Soares is a psychoanalyst and holds a PhD from Radboud University. He is a Research Assistant at the Center for Contemporary European Philosophy and conducts research in Brazil and the Netherlands for the Stichting Psychoanalytische Fondsen. His academic career has included work at Radboud University's Behavioural Science Institute and teaching at universities in Brazil. He is a member of SIPP–ISPP.

By following the thread of fetishism across Sigmund Freud’s work, this book uncovers a fundamental instability within psychoanalytic thought itself. Both historically precise and conceptually bold, it transforms what Freud called a “riddle” into a powerful lens for rethinking sexuality, normativity, and desire. A significant contribution to contemporary debates in psychoanalysis, philosophy, and gender studies. - Léa Silveira, Federal University of Ceará

Soares traces the 'riddle of fetishism' with rare historical precision, showing how Freud's most unstable concept became the secret engine of psychoanalytic thought itself – and why it still unsettles our categories today. - Esther Hutfless, Sigmund Freud Private University Vienna

This book is a lucid and rigorously argued account of fetishism that brings Binet, Freud, and Lacan into a productive dialogue. Combining close readings of primary texts with sophisticated theoretical synthesis, the author illuminates the “riddle of fetishism.” Rich in archival insight and contemporary relevance, the book advances our understanding of desire and object relations and will become essential reading for scholars and students of psychoanalysis, critical theory, and cultural studies. An important contribution that both deepens and expands the conversation on fetishism. - Victor Blüml, Medical University of Vienna

Frequently Asked Questions

What is "An Acceptable Abnormality?" about?

Unravelling the Fetish: Freud and the Riddles of Desire.

Long regarded as a marginal phenomenon, fetishism reshaped the foundations of psychoanalysis. By tracing the evolution of Freud’s thinking on fetishism — from his early pathologisation to his later understanding of it as a source of sexual and psychic meaning — this book reveals how his attention to fetishism compelled him to rethink desire, object‑choice, and the roots of inner conflict. In this book, Ednei Soares, drawing on the influence of Alfred Binet, early neuropathology, and later debates in Lacanian theory, as well as feminist, queer, and trans theory, explains why fetishism became central to discussions that shape gender studies today and contemporary reflections on identity.

An Acceptable Abnormality? invites readers to view fetishism not as a curious anomaly but as a powerful lens through which we can understand how desire takes form. This compelling book opens new ways of thinking about human sexuality, making it essential reading for specialists while remaining accessible to a broad audience.

This book will be made open access within three years of publication thanks to Path to Open, a program developed in partnership between JSTOR, the American Council of Learned Societies (ACLS), University of Michigan Press, and The University of North Carolina Press to bring about equitable access and impact for the entire scholarly community, including authors, researchers, libraries, and university presses around the world. Learn more at https://about.jstor.org/path-to-open/

Who wrote "An Acceptable Abnormality?"?

"An Acceptable Abnormality?" was written by Ednei Soares.

Ednei Soares is a psychoanalyst and holds a PhD from Radboud University. He is a Research Assistant at the Center for Contemporary European Philosophy and conducts research in Brazil and the Netherlands for the Stichting Psychoanalytische Fondsen. His academic career has included work at Radboud University's Behavioural Science Institute and teaching at universities in Brazil. He is a member of SIPP–ISPP.

Is "An Acceptable Abnormality?" part of a series?

Yes, "An Acceptable Abnormality?" is part of the "Figures of the Unconscious" series.

In collaboration with the International Society for Psychoanalysis and Philosophy (SIPP-ISPP).

GPRC

The peer-reviewed book series Figures of the Unconscious was founded in 2001 and provides a platform for exchange at the intersection of philosophy and psychoanalysis. Psychoanalysis occupies a crucial position within contemporary philosophical thinking and many analysts are influenced by philosophical approaches.

Both philosophy and psychoanalysis are concerned with the nature of the subject, questions of knowledge and epistemology, sexuality, life and death, ethical issues, alterity, and the subject’s manifold relationships to the other - to other human and non-human beings and to its environment.

We welcome manuscripts in the areas and at the intersections of

  • the history of psychoanalysis and Freudian thought
  • the exploration of psychoanalytic concepts and the development of theories
  • the research and development of the psychoanalytic movement
  • psychoanalytic and philosophical concepts and ideas
  • psychoanalysis, gender and queer studies
  • interdisciplinary approaches that combine psychoanalysis with other scientific disciplines
  • current developments in psychoanalytic approaches
  • ethical approaches in psychoanalysis
  • epistemological debates

Editors-in-Chief

Beatriz Santos (Université de Paris)
Herman Westerink (Radboud University)
Esther Hutfless (Sigmund Freud University Linz)

Editorial board

Daniela Finzi (Freud Museum Vienna)
Jeff Bloechl (Boston College)

Advisory Board

Lisa Baraitser (Birkbeck College, London)
Jozef Corveleyn (KU Leuven)
Monique David-Ménard (Université de Paris)
Rodrigo De La Fabián (Universidad Diego Portales, Santiago de Chile)
Jens De Vleminck (Leuven)
Eran Dorfman (University of Tel Aviv)
Laurie Laufer (Université de Paris)
Elissa Marder (Emory University, Atlanta)
Claire Nioche (Université Paris XIII)
Vladimir Safatle (Universidade de São Paulo)
Charles Shepherdson (State University of New York at Albany)
Guillaume Silbertin Blanc (Université Paris 8)
Raluca Soreanu (University of Essex)
Celine Surprenant (Paris)
Antônio Teixeira (Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais)
Johan Van Der Walt (University of Luxemburg)
Wilfried Ver Eecke (Georgetown University)

Proposals

The board accepts manuscripts for review from both members and non-members of the SIPP-ISPP. These can be either monographs or edited volumes, provided they align with the aims and scope of the series.

Proposals and enquiries can be sent to the series editors-in-chief.
Please make use of the submission form to present your manuscript or proposal to our board.
Authors interested in Open Access can consult the available funding options.

Links & Resources

Proposal Submission Form
Open Access & Funding Options
Who funded the publication of "An Acceptable Abnormality?"?

Publication of "An Acceptable Abnormality?" was funded by Path to Open
.

What is the Table of Contents for "An Acceptable Abnormality?"?

Acknowledgements

Chapter 1 Introduction

Chapter 2 Freud and His Forebears: Binet and Krafft-Ebing
1. The Riddle of Fetishism
2. Alfred Binet and the Riddle of Fetishism
Binet and Doubling
Binet’s Conceptualization of Fetishism: The Birth of a Riddle
3. Freud, Krafft-Ebing, and the Problem of Perversions
Krafft-Ebing’s Classification of Perversions
Fetishism, Masochism, and Shared Aetiology
4. Freud’s Clinical Framework: The Neurosis–Perversion Opposition

Chapter 3 The Neurotic “Negative”: Freud’s Early Perversion Theory
1. Freud’s Early Aetiology of Neurosis and Perversion
2. Inherited Concepts: Trauma, Splitting, and Defence in Freud’s 1890s Work
3. The Nascent “Riddle”: Fetishism’s Challenge to Freud’s Early Framework

Chapter 4 The Initial Confrontation: Fetishism in Freud’s Three Essays and Early Revisions (1905–8)
1. Fetishism and the Breakdown of Freud’s 1905 Framework
2. Childhood Impressions and the Turn to Fantasy
3. Infantile Theories, Castration Anxiety, and the Object

Chapter 5 Deepening the Riddle: Fetishism, Trauma, and the Oedipus Complex (1909–20)
1. On the Genesis of Fetishism (1909)
2. The Role of the Fetish in Totem and Taboo
3. Freud’s Development of Binet’s Theory of Childhood Trauma
4. The Oedipus Complex and the Aetiology of Perversions
5. Fetishism and the Riddle

Chapter 6 Freud’s Late Works on Fetishism
1. Freud on Fetishism: Early and Late
2. Fetishism (1927) and Other Works
3. Freud on Disavowal, Scotomization, and Splitting in Fetishism
4. Freud on Binet on Double-Sided Fetishes
5. Fetishism in Freud’s Works in the Late 1930s
6. Freud, Fetishism, and the Brain
7. Freud’s Psychoanalytic Theory and Fetishism

Chapter 7 “Fetishism” and Freud’s Riddle in Jacques Lacan’s Work
1. Doubling, Personality, and Perversity in Lacan’s Theorization of Fetishism
Binet’s Ideas on Paranoia as Doubling of Personality in Lacan’s Explorations
Lacan’s Initial Approach to Fetishism
Lacan’s Psychoanalytic Model of Doubling
2. Lacan’s Debate on Fetishism with Object-Relation Theory
Fetishism as an Object-Relation Phenomenon
Fetishism as a Paradigm of Perversion in Lacan’s Theory
3. The Fetish as a Model of the Object of Human Desire in Lacan’s Thinking

Conclusion
References

What is the DOI for "An Acceptable Abnormality?"?

The Digital Object Identifier (DOI) for "An Acceptable Abnormality?" is 10.11116/9789461667946.

Related titles